Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic)
Stranger Things
$19.23
▼12.3%
market price guide
Active Listings
0
tracked now GrailNest only counts listings that confidently match this exact item and version, so the count is often lower than a raw eBay search.Lowest Listed
🔒 Upgrade to Pro
Value by condition · PriceCharting guide
$12.00
Loose
$16.00
Damaged box
$19.23
Mint / new
Loose = out of box · Damaged box = complete but worn box · Mint = sealed
$19.23 est. value
Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic)
Product details
- Pop number
- #642
- Series
- Pop!
- Franchise
- Stranger Things
- Character
- Steve with Bandana
- Release year
- 2018
- Exclusive
- Hot Topic
- Barcode (UPC)
- 889698308816
- Market confidence
- High
- Catalog status
- Source Verified
Price History
🔒 Price History is a Pro feature
See day-by-day value trends and the full market-data history for every item.
Upgrade to Pro →Found a listing?
Spotted this Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) for sale somewhere? Drop the link and price to help GrailNest keep values accurate for everyone.
About Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic)
Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) is Funko Pop! #642 from Stranger Things. It features Steve with Bandana from Stranger Things. This release is a Hot Topic exclusive. It was released in 2018. The current GrailNest market value is around $19.23, based on recent active listings across the market.
Frequently asked questions
How much is Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) worth?
Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) has a current GrailNest market value of about $19.23, based on recent active listings across the market. Values change over time — check this page for the latest range.
What franchise is Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) from?
Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) is from Stranger Things.
What is the item number for Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic)?
Steve with Bandana - Stranger Things (Hot Topic) is #642.
